The Stinging Nettle (why do I read these things?) writes the following about Democrat strategy:
Choose your poison...Sigh. It's not even worth reading his mutliple choice -- something like (1) Bush is an illegitimate "selected" president or (2) because the Democrat leadership, Hans Blix, Clinton, France, the UN all knew there were WMDs and, whatever. I wonder if this guy could come up with a better strategy? Probably not, as his 4% in New Hampshire might suggest.
So it seems to me that things transpired in one of two ways, either of which, in the hands of a competent opposition (by which I do NOT mean this guy or this guy ) would be a freaking grand slam. The Administration claimed for months that it knew where the WMDs were and that we knew that Iraq had them. Therefore, two months after the "end of hostilities," either:
