"Do you know what answers all of that hyperbolic verbosity? 168-4." Well, that's what Schumer has to say about why he is opposing the judges. Very impressive, Chucky.
Just to put a face on this, here's one of the Judges, who won more votes from Californians than her fellow California Supreme Court justices.
California loves her, but to Schumer and the Democrats, she is "out of the mainstream." I guess Californians are too -- especially since they started supporting the occasional Republican. And he says it's because of her opinions, in which she said that she doesn't like kleptocracy and she found some zoning rule somewhere to be analogous to government theft. Sounds like Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992). Or because she thinks that community and family are more important for protecting values than some bureaucratic, centralized and impersonable government. Sounds like It Takes a Village (1996).
This is all they can find to defame Justice Brown? The Democrats have no shame.
And now, John Corzine is showing is firm grasp of legal issues, summed up by his statement, "I don't know, I'm not a lawyer". There's a good sign that you shouldn't even attempt to analyze legal reasoning.
Labels: Schumer
