2004 Election Analysis | College Football Ratings | College Basketball Ratings | Archive | Atom Feed

Cocoon of Fear

Official Battlestar Galactica Blog


Other interesting stuff

Ace of Spades HQ
American Copywriter
Atrios
Becker/Posner
Thomas P.M. Barnett
ColdHeartedTruth
College Football Ranking Comparison
College Basketball Ranking Comparison
Conservative Perspective
Country Store
DailyKos
Daly Thoughts
Everything I Know is Wrong
Editorial Cartoons
Freaking News
Christopher Hitchens
In the Loop
Iraq the Model
The Knight Shift
This Liberal
The Longhorn Mafia
NCRepublicans.com
NEWSBUSTERS
The North Lot
The Onion
The Prejudicial Effect
Protein Wisdom
Random John
Reactuate
RealClearPolitics
Red State
Riding Sun
Tar Heels

My Ecosystem Details













Pajamas Media

North Carolina Bloggers















Saturday, September 27, 2003
LIBERALS: THE REAL CENSORS


A conservative radio show host in Rochester New York has been indefinitely suspended from his job and is to undergo "diversity training" after making what a
local paper called: "comments that alluded to Rochester’s African-American mayor as a 'monkey' and 'orangutan.'”

Lonsberry made two controversial remarks recently that alluded to Mayor William A. Johnson Jr.’s campaign for Monroe County executive.
Late last month, Lonsberry made the first comment after an orangutan briefly escaped from a cage at the Seneca Park Zoo.
“Headline: Orangutan escapes at zoo, runs for county executive. Fascinating stuff,” Lonsberry said.
On Thursday, Lonsberry played what he said was the last caller of his show. Music that suggested a jungle scene with monkey sounds was then heard.
Lonsberry responded, “Freakin’ monkeys loose up at the zoo again. That’s really fine, really fine. Yeah, yeah, and he’s running for county executive. What is with that? I think we better go now.”

After he was accused of racism, Lonsberry called the Mayor to apologize, and insisted that he had no racist intent with his comments.

Despite his apologies, Lonsberry may lose his job. The local liberals, including the Mayor and other elected officials are opening calling for him to be banned or suspended from Rochester airwaves.

Do I approve of Lonsberry's comments?

No.

However, the way that his comments are being addressed is a perfect demonstration of the liberal double standard on censorship.

When Dixie Chick Nathalie Maines said she was ashamed over the President being from Texas, it offended a lot of people. A lot of whom decided--of their own free will--not to buy or play Dixie Chick records any more. Nobody from the government said they should be banned. People took it upon themselves to vote with their pocketbooks.

But a lot of people on the left called that "censorship."


Contrast that to what's going on in Rochester:
we have the Mayor of a City, the local NAACP and the members of a government legislative body calling for a talk show host's termination based on something he said. Government officials are openly calling for someone--someone who in the past has disagreed with them--to be taken off the air.

In other words, we have government figures directly calling for someone to be punished for their words.

Ladies and Gentlemen, that's real censorship.

Where are all the self-proclaimed guardians of free speech now?

Probably listening to their Dixie Chick records and figuring out ways to get more conservatives silenced.


filed by Hank 11:37 AM
|
Tuesday, September 23, 2003
THOSE WHO FORGET HISTORY ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT
Despite George Bush's address to the United Nations prior to the liberation of Iraq, despite Colin Powell's powerful presentation to the United Nations Security Council detailing Saddam's nefarious designs and his history of oppressing and torturing his citizens, despite multiple phone calls, massive attempts art arm twisting and sending Tony Blair off to battle the ignorance and intransigence of the French, Germans and other appeasers, despite draft after draft of resolution put forth at the Security Council and revisions to address the concerns of Chile and Angola, here's
how Reuters begins it's story on President Bush's speech today to the U.N.:
President Bush came under fire for bypassing the United Nations to invade Iraq as he tried to convince the world on Tuesday to share the burden of postwar occupation and reconstruction.
Bypass? We might have ignored the decision of the French to veto the resolution, we might have ignored the wishes of the Syrian dictator, the Egyptian President-for-life and the leaders of Hamas and Hezbollah, we might have refused to turn over the Pentagon to Hans Blix and Kofi Annan, but we certainly didn't "bypass" the U.N.

With General Wesley Clark's entry into the Democratic presidential sweepstakes, this would be a good time for the media to ask him about "bypassing" the U.N. The good General surely knows something about it. His president never addressed the U.N. before bombing Serbia, never went to the Security Council, never presented any resolution asking if we could bomb the Serbians. But I'm not going to hold my breath.



filed by Winston 1:55 PM
|
Monday, September 22, 2003
A MORE OR LESS RHETORICAL QUESTION

Will the same liberals who have denounced the military "brass" as warmongerers for at least thirty years, and who claimed that Colin Powell's status as a retired general made him unfit to serve as Secretary of State, suddenly start arguing that Wesley Clark's military service makes him more qualified to be President?


filed by Hank 1:20 PM
|
CLARK, DEAN, KERRY, LIEBERMAN?
Who would Osama want to be President? He can't get Bill "No thanks, Sudan" Clinton back, so he has to pick from the 9 dwarves and a General. Jeff Christian wonders what Osama thinks in his latest cartoon. Click below:


filed by Winston 12:01 PM
|

Who links to me?