A LIEBERMAN STRATEGY
OK, Lieberman is around 4% in NH and it's probably time to get the fork. But here's a suggested strategy. About 25% of the Iowa Dems think that it was right to go to war, and pundits think that NH voters are a little less anti-war than Iowa voters (don't know that it's true). So, Lieberman is the only proud pro-war candidate. Kerry and Edwards voted for it, but have spent the last year saying that they had their fingers crossed.

So, with maybe more than 25% of NH Dems being pro-war and with the leader in the NH polls hovering around that level of support, Lieberman needs to court these reasonable Democrats. Sure, 25% isn't enough to win the nomination, but it could give him much needed momentum going into South Carolina, where he polls better and where Democrats are probably a little more pro-war, pro-liberation, than the "live free or die" crowd in New England. Lieberman's argument: I'm the only one in this race that believes going to war a brutal dictator who funded terrorists and incited hatred again the United States and Israel was a good thing. That going to war to fight for freedom is right and that the United States should not stand on the sidelines while the forces of evil marshall their resources. I'd have gone to war, but I wouldn't have made the same mistakes that Bush made, and I'd have certainly had a plan for the post-war. If you agree that freedom is worth defending, that we shouldn't sit on history's bench and allow millions to suffer, vote for me.

It may not work, but it's worth a shot. Nothing he's doing now seems to be working. I've always liked Joe, even though I'm afraid that he may be manipulating political events from behind the scenes and raising a clone army.